Perbandingan Prinsip Good Corporate Governance pada Bank Konvensional dan Bank Syariah dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia

In terms of how to determine prices, banks are divided into two types, n
amely
conventional banks and Islamic banks. Conventional banks and
Islamic banks must
apply the principles of Good Corporate Governance in their business activities
because conventional banks and Islamic banks are intermediary institution
s that
function to collect funds from the public and channel these funds back to
the public
on
the basis of trust. This research aims to explain the comparison of
the principles of
Good Corporate Governance in conventional banks and Islamic bank
s in Indonesia.
The method used in this research is normative legal research, using a st
atutory
approach. The principles of Good Corporate Governance, namely the pri
nciples of
transparency, accountability, responsibility, independence and fairn
ess. Basically, the
application of the principles of Good Corporate Governance in convention
al banks
and Islamic banks is the same, because it refers to the 'Guidelines for Good Co
rporate
Governance of the Indonesian Banking' issued by the National Committ
ee on
Governance Policy. The difference is the principle of Good Corporate Governa
nce in
Islamic banks is strictly regulated in Article 34 Paragraph (1) of Law
No. 21/2008.
Another difference lies in the Islamic principles used by Islamic banks because
besides being fostered and supervised by the Financial Services Authority,
Islamic
banks also supervised by the National Sharia Council of the Council of Indonesia
n
Ulama in general and the Sharia Supervisory Board in particular.
Keywords:
Good Corporate Governance Principles; Islamic Banking; Comparison